Shakur Stevenson, the WBC lightweight titleholder, has recently come under fire for his upcoming fight against Joe Cordina in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The match has been criticized for various reasons, including Cordina’s recent knockout loss, lack of experience at the 135 weight class, and overall low demand from the public. With little to no recognition among U.S boxing fans, the decision to pit Stevenson against Cordina seems misguided at best.
In his quest to build up his reputation and potentially face off against Gervonta Davis in the future, Stevenson has taken a questionable approach. By choosing opponents like Cordina, who lack the star power or competitive edge to truly elevate Stevenson’s career, he risks diminishing his own standing in the boxing world. This strategy could ultimately backfire, leaving Stevenson in a worse position than before.
The Risk of Playing it Safe
Stevenson’s reluctance to engage in the same aggressive style as fighters like Anthony Cacace, who have managed to secure impressive victories, may be his downfall. By opting for a more defensive, strategic approach to his matches, Stevenson runs the risk of appearing risk-averse and lacking the true grit and determination that fans look for in a champion. This cautious mindset could ultimately cost him in the long run.
As Stevenson continues on his path to stardom, it is essential that he reconsiders his approach to fight selection and strategy. By taking on opponents who pose a real challenge and pushing himself to fight with more intensity and courage, Stevenson can begin to rebuild his reputation and prove his worth as a true boxing champion. Only time will tell if Stevenson can rise to the occasion and overcome the obstacles that stand in his way.