The recent fight between Joseph Parker and Zhilei Zhang has left many boxing fans in disbelief. Despite Zhang scoring two knockdowns and seemingly winning six rounds, Parker was declared the winner in a controversial 12 round majority decision. The decision has sparked outrage on social media, with many questioning the credibility of the judging.
Questionable Judging
The judges’ scorecards revealed a puzzling outcome:— 113-113, 114-112 in favor of Parker, and 115-111 in favor of Parker. With two knockdowns in Zhang’s favor, it seems illogical that Parker would be awarded the victory. The discrepancy in the scoring has raised serious doubts about the integrity of the judging process.
Fortunately, there is a rematch clause in place, allowing Zhang to have another shot at redemption. The rematch is crucial in setting the record straight and giving Zhang a fair chance at victory. The existence of the rematch clause highlights the widespread skepticism surrounding the initial decision and the need for a thorough review of the judging criteria.
Parker’s win over Zhang has positioned him as the mandatory challenger for the WBO heavyweight title held by Oleksandr Usyk. However, the mandatory rematch with Zhang looms large, casting a shadow of doubt over Parker’s true capabilities. The controversy surrounding the first fight has tainted the legitimacy of Parker’s claim to the title shot, raising concerns about the integrity of the boxing industry as a whole.
The victory of Joseph Parker over Zhilei Zhang is marred by controversy and calls into question the fairness and transparency of the judging process in boxing. The rematch between the two fighters will be crucial in restoring credibility to the sport and ensuring that justice is served. Fans and athletes alike deserve better than the questionable decisions that have marred the sport in recent years.