In a matchup that has garnered mixed reactions, Ryan Garcia (24-1, 20 KOs) is slated to face Rolando “Rolly” Romero (16-2, 13 KOs) for the WBA secondary welterweight title this coming May in Times Square. While the buzz surrounding the event is palpable, it is essential to dissect the implications of such a fight and the questionable value of the title that will be at stake.
It’s noteworthy that neither Garcia nor Romero currently holds a position in the top 15 rankings of any of the four major boxing sanctioning bodies at the 147-pound welterweight division. For many boxing aficionados, this lack of merit raises eyebrows regarding the legitimacy of competing for a title of any sort—let alone one marketed as prestigious. The World Boxing Association (WBA) had previously hinted at reducing redundant titles, yet it seems the tradition of granting belts continues unabated, much to the chagrin of boxing fans who crave genuine competition and clarity within the sport.
The reaction on social media platforms has been largely unfavorable, with many boxing enthusiasts expressing their disdain over the upcoming bout being billed as a title fight. Critics describe the WBA secondary title as an insult to the sport, arguing that it shouldn’t be decoratively bestowed to fighters who have not earned the privilege. This sentiment underscores a pressing need for reform in the sport—boxing would benefit greatly from a unified governing body that could streamline a competitive landscape and restore integrity to championship titles. For casual fans, the allure of a title might be enough to attract attention, but for hard-core followers, it merely feels like a gimmick devoid of real significance.
Adding to the controversy is the fact that Garcia is returning from a one-year suspension for testing positive for Ostarine, a prohibited substance. This situation further complicates perceptions of fairness in what should be a genuine effort to establish a titleholder at welterweight. Romero’s recent history is also telling; following a knockout loss last year, he has yet to demonstrate the necessary aptitude to regain any semblance of credibility in the ring. When viewed alongside champion Eimantas Stanionis, who represents the traditional ideals of title competition, the stakes seem even more trivial.
The forthcoming showdown between Garcia and Romero may attract viewers, but it feels like a subpar spectacle within the grand context of boxing. The sport must navigate the challenging landscape of multiple sanctioning bodies and a plethora of titles, which only muddles the path to legitimacy. To regain the luster associated with championship belts, it is crucial for the boxing community to advocate for structural reforms that prioritize integrity and true competition over mere commercial appeal. As it stands, this matchup might be less about crowning a legitimate champion and more about sustaining a flawed title narrative that needs urgent correction.